From Caesar to Teare: The Enduring Legacy of Power Reflected within Newcastle Castle Keep.

King Teare: Newcastle Keep from Caesar to Teare
 
Introduction: The Need for Transformation
On the same day I visited the Holy Island of Lindisfarne (Adam, 2009, Teare, 2025), I also explored Newcastle Castle Keep (Buswell, 1984). This fortress stands as more than a historic landmark, it’s a symbol of layered identity, power, and the quiet resilience of the North (Adams, 2013, Teare, 2025). This blog piece argues for a radical rethinking of our cultural institutions, and an education revolution rooted in equity, empathy, and historical awareness (Fadil, Sudrajat & Amboro, 2021). Through Newcastle’s legacy, we reflect on the disparity of knowledge, invisible hierarchies, and the possibilities for collective change (Drury & Reicher, 2000).
 
Newcastle and the Performance of Pride
Newcastle is a city rich with invention and cultural memory, but that pride can distort perspective (Tracy & Robbins, 2007, Brannon, 2023). While the region played a role in breakthroughs like with the steam engine and the electric lightbulb’s first ever public demonstration, these were not isolated phenomena (Grandpierre, 1997). Scientific progress is collective, and ideas often emerge simultaneously in different places (Turner, 2014, p. 221). Regional exceptionalism can warp our understanding of how knowledge flows, through networks, through cultural osmosis, and through the unconscious (Turner, 2014).

Our recent football victory, as our first major cup in 70 years (Clarke, 2011), offered a unifying story, celebrated nationally. But this civic momentum must be channelled into something greater: tackling food insecurity, housing inequality, and systemic exclusion. I recently visited a food bank and was struck by the dignity of those working in a broken system. Why is this level of need normalised? Why does meaningful policy change seem so slow?
 
Misconceptions of Ability and the Politics of IQ
The myth of "ability" is too often framed through falsehoods like eugenic  theory (Jamieson, 1996) or reductionist models of intelligence (Davidson & Downing, 2000). Environmental, social, and emotional contexts shape what people can do (Davidson & Downing, 2000, p. 68). Many with privilege fail to notice their advantages until directly confronted. This is not merely ignorance, it’s a symptom of cultural conditioning and unprocessed fear. Those at the top often become conservative, not politically but psychologically, terrified of falling back down the perceived hierarchy.

Risk-aversion defines much of our governance. It inhibits innovation and silences activists. The system is not broken by accident, as it is held in place by caution disguised as pragmatism. Hence the Geordie phrase that drives me: "Shy Bairns Get Nowt." The world is hard by design, but it needn't be. Systems can be made more accessible, more empathetic, more human. We need a cultural shift guided by ethics and spiritual clarity, drawing on figures we all respect historically like Jesus (Brinsley, 1652, deHaven-Smith, 2001), Dr. King (King, 1964), Augusto Boal (Boal, 1974), Princess Diana, and Queen Elizabeth II (Mollick, 1964).

If I’d had the chance to meet our late Queen, I’d have shared my work on participatory democracy, as story-based leadership for a tool with justice. Her legacy was shaped not just by tradition as many perceive, but by key interventions, such as protecting women’s aid organisations in their early development (Hilton, year unknown). So, what makes a legacy? 
 
Light and Reclamation
When the lightbulb was first turned on at Newcastle’s Lit and Phil (Robbins & Mead, 1989), it wasn’t a test, it was a performance. Science is often staged. Demonstrations are theatre with the intent to inspire, convince, and legitimise. And like all theatre, it asks an audience to suspend disbelief. In some ways, science and magic are siblings especially in it's presentation style for demonstrations.

Cultural icons like Ant and Dec (Leggot, 2021), Northeast figures who grew up alongside us, have flirted with Invisible Theatre too. Their comedy, from Pokémon rap battles to public pranks, used storytelling to shift perception. I would remind them that as artists and educators, we should examine how narrative empowers the public to confront their oppressions.

Boal’s legacy (Boal, 1974, 1980, 1998, Boal J, Howe & Soeiro, 2019), continued by his son Julian (Boal J, 2023), warns us that even well-intentioned performances can reinforce harm, if not carefully constructed. Ethical storytelling is not about avoiding violence or discomfort; it’s about the truth behind those depictions. Tarantino (Pagello, 2020), often misunderstood, doesn’t glorify brutality; he reframes it. "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood" is trauma reimagined, giving the viewer symbolic justice. That’s a kind of therapy, a way to break narrative imprisonment.
 
Data, Dependency, and the Price of Access
Economic growth charts mean little if the people are left behind. Many people in positions of authority have blind faith in statistics (Ziegler, 2007). If your methods only measure profits or surface-level wellbeing, you miss the emotional, spiritual, and communal toll of modern life. Regions are plagued by addiction, poor mental health, and chronic insecurity, amplified by the recent legacy of the pandemic years. Our response must be holistic, grounded in lived experience and positive reinforcement.

We already have the knowledge to address many of these problems and what we lack is the access to education, and critical assessment, as it's is behind a paywall. If we removed it, we’d see an education revolution. Competitiveness is overrated and we need cooperation. We need learning as community repair because when someone becomes curious, they will simply continue learning. We must foster curiosity in education (Caldas, 2020).
 
The Castle as a Metaphor and a Reality
Newcastle Castle isn’t just a historical site, it’s a physical symbol of authority, defence, and transition. Built during the Norman consolidation of England (Freeman, 1873), the castle marked dominance and controlled one of the most strategic river crossings in the country. Standing atop the Keep, overlooking the Tyne, you're suspended in time, caught between stone fortification and the skyline of post-industrial ambition.

Inside, the exhibitions reflect key events like the English Civil War, while the architecture whispers of feudal power and domestic life. This is what Ashworth and Tunbridge (1990) meant when they described heritage as the construction of collective memory. And as Smith (2006) argues, heritage sites aren’t just about the past they shape our belonging and cultural continuity.

Newcastle Castle is a living artefact. It holds a mirror up to who we were and who we are. It reminds us that legacy can defend or empower. And it calls us to question what kind of future we are constructing. Interestingly the mantel of Caesar is connected to the site (Burley, 1993, p. 120). History tells us that the foundation stones for the Castle were taken from Hadrian Caesar’s wall (Burley, 1993, p. 125). Julius, the father of cryptography (Grant, 1976), his legacy reached all the way to Newcastle Castle, and it still stands strong today (Burley, 1993). Standing atop the keep I considered my own legacy and the concept of a mantel shared and it’s symbolic meaning (Chambers, 1895).  
 
Though not explicitly theatrical, Newcastle Castle radiates an ambient dramaturgy. Its corridors, towers, and secluded chapels feel like cryptic backdrops, waiting to be activated by performance (Turner, 1969). The emblems of the Three Lions embedded within the architecture signal a symbolic convergence: royal authority, pride, and collective aspiration. Three could be a symbol of the holy trinity or maybe there is more to discover here. Historically, this motif represented sovereign continuity. Today, it's plastered across stadiums, jerseys, and national campaigns for belief and unity. Inside, the small spiritual chamber had a disproportionate impact with me. There, ritual meets architecture. These are spaces not just for defence or worship, but for mythmaking: invocations of kingship, divine right, and national destiny. By merely walking these halls, we participate in an unwitting performance of heritage. History, in this sense, is not just studied but enacted. To feel oneself as part of history is a subjunctive experience, in Turner’s terms, a momentary rupture in linear time, where the self merges with ancestral narrative.
 
Conclusion: Legacy and Awakening
Newcastle city is a place with the potential to lead. But we must unlearn old structures, reject inherited inequality, and embrace new forms of knowledge and leadership. The Keep reminds us that power is always contested. The lightbulb shows us that performance matters even in the invisible/dark. The food banks are telling us that empathy is action. If we’re to make lasting change now, it will be because we redefined what counts as intelligence, what counts as success, and what we are all willing to stand for. Let this be the start of an education revolution, not just of schools, but of hearts, minds, and the systems we participate in. 

Bibliography
Adam, D. (2009) The Holy Island of Lindisfarne. New York: Morehouse.
Adams, M. (2013) The King in the North: the life and times of Oswald of Northumbria. London: Head of Zeus
Ashworth, G.J., & Tunbridge, J.E. (2000). The Tourist-Historic City (1st ed.). Routledge.
Bergmann, S. (2017). Religion, Space, and the Environment. London: Taylor & Francis.
Boal, A. (1974). Theatre of the Oppressed. London: Pluto Press.
Boal, A. (1980). Stop! C’est Magique!. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
Boal, A. (1998) Legislative Theatre: Using Performance to Make Politics. London: Routledge.
Boal, J., Howe, K., & Soeiro, J. (2019). The Routledge companion to Theatre of the Oppressed. New York: Routledge.
Boal, J. (2023) Theatre of the Oppressed and its Times. 1st edn. Abingdon: Routledge.
Brannon, T.N. (2023) ‘Pride-and-prejudice perspectives of marginalization can advance science and society’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(1), pp. 73–80. 
BRINSLEY, J., (1652) Mystical implantation, or, The great gospel mystery of the Christian's union, and communion with, and conformity to Jesus Christ both in His death and resurrection opened and applyed / by John Brinsley. London
Burley, A. R., 1993. Hadrian: The Restless Emperor. London: Thames & Hudson.
Buswell, R.J. (1984) ‘Reconciling the past with the present: Conservation policy in Newcastle upon Tyne’, Cities, 1(5), pp. 500–514. 
Caldas, B. (2020) ‘The Boal-Freire nexus: Rehearsing praxis, imagining liberation in bilingual teacher education’, L2 Journal: An Open Access Refereed Journal for World Language Educators, 12(2), pp. 1–18. 
Chambers, R. W., 1895. The Yellow King (or The King in Yellow). New York: Street & Smith.
Clarke, G. (2011) Newcastle United: Fifty years of hurt. London: Random House.
Davidson, J.E. and Downing, C.L. (2000) ‘Contemporary models of intelligence’, in R.J. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–49. 
deHaven-Smith, L. (2001). The Hidden Teachings of Jesus: The Political Meaning of the Kingdom of God. York Beach, ME: Red Wheel/Weiser.
Drury, J. and Reicher, S. (2000) ‘Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), pp. 579–604. 
Fadli, M.R., Sudrajat, A. and Amboro, K. (2021) ‘The influence of "Sorogan" method in learning history to increase historical understanding and historical awareness’, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), pp. 300–307. 
Freeman, E.A. (1873) The History of the Norman Conquest of England: Its Causes and Its Results. Volume 4. Oxford: Clarendon Press for Macmillan and Company, New York. 
Grandpierre, A. (1997) ‘The physics of collective consciousness’, World Futures: Journal of General Evolution, 48(1–4), pp. 23–56. 
Grant, M., 1976. The 12 Caesars. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Hilton, M. (year unknown) ‘Women’s Aid Federation’, in A historical guide to NGOs in Britain. (Publisher and year details needed), p. 255. 
Jamieson, J.W. (1996) ‘Intellectual ability, evolution and eugenics’, Mankind Quarterly, 36(3), p. 381.
King, M.L. (1964). Why We Can’t Wait. New York: Harper & Row.
Leggott, J. (2021) The North East of England on Film and Television. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 
Mollick, K. (2014) ‘Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Diana’, in M. Celis and E. Childs (eds.) Global women leaders: Studies in feminist political rhetoric. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 19. 
Pagello, F. (2020) Quentin Tarantino and Film Theory: Aesthetics and Dialectics in Late Postmodernity. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 
Robbins, C. and Mead, C., 1989. The History of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Newcastle 1896-1989. Newcastle: Newcastle City Library. 
Smith, L. (2006) Uses of Heritage. London ; New York: Routledge.
Teare, K. (2025) ‘The House of Arts and Human Intelligence’, King Teare. Available at: https://wwwkingteare.com/thehouseofartsandhumanintelligence (Accessed: 14th of June 2025).
Teare, K. (2025) 'Holy Island of Lindisfarne is important, but perhaps even more than people might think. My journey to Lindisfarne - King Teare', King Teare. Available at: www.kingteare.com/academic-blog/holy-island-of-lindisfarne-is-important-but-perhaps-even-more-than-people-might-think-my-journey-to-lindisfarne-king-teare#/ (Accessed: 14th of June 2025).
Tracy, J.L. and Robins, R.W. (2007) ‘The nature of pride’, in J.L. Tracy, R.W. Robins and J.P. Tangney (eds.) The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 263–282. 
Turner, M. (2014) The origin of ideas: Blending, creativity, and the human spark. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
Turner, V., 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
Ziegler, R. (2007) ‘Resist blind faith in statistics’, Alternatives Journal (AJ) – Canada’s Environmental Voice, 33.